IMPLICATIONS FOR THE STANDARDS FOR EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING FOR EDUCATIONAL POLICY AND ACCOUNTABILITY

PRESENTATION FROM:
      Webinar Series: Decoding the Standards - October 8, 2015
      Buros Center for Testing
      
AVAILABLE FOR APA CE and NASP CPD Credit (1.25 Credit Hour)

Click on CC button in video frame for Closed Captioning

Downloadable Resources

CONTINUING EDUCATION OPTIONS

American Psychological Association (APA)
Buros Center for Testing is approved by the American Psychological Association to sponsor continuing education for psychologists.  Buros Center for Testing maintains responsibility for the program and its content.

National Association of School Psychologists (NASP)
Buros Center for Testing is approved by the National Association of School Psychologists to offer professional development for school psychologists. Buros Center for Testing maintains responsibility for this program and its content. (Provider #1113)

New York State Education Department (NYSED)
Buros Center for Testing, University of Nebraska-Lincoln is recognized by the New York State Education Department's State Board for Psychology as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed psychologists #PSY-0187.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR OBTAINING continuing education CREDIT (OPTIONAL)

After viewing this video in its entirety, click on the link below or copy it into your internet browser to complete a short quiz and program evaluation. A completed evaluation will trigger a request to the Buros Center CE program administrator. Please allow five business days after completing the evaluation to receive your documentation of completion. For questions or concerns, email Jessica Jonson at jjonson@buros.org.

Content Information

TITLE: Implications of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing for Educational Policy and Accountability (60 min.) LEARNING OBJECTIVES: 1. Describe the main ideas presented in the Standards chapter on Program Evaluation, Policy Studies, and Accountability. 2. Identify ways in which the material on foundations and operations in the Standards applies to the use of tests for evaluation, policy studies, and accountability purposes. 3. Explain the importance of subjecting not just tests, but the metrics used for decision making in accountability systems, to the kinds of validity, reliability, and fairness criteria suggested by the Standards. ABSTRACT: This intermediate-level webinar focuses on the applications of the 2014 Standards for using tests for program evaluation, accountability, and other policy-related purposes. Although previous versions of the Standards address these uses, several changes were made to the current version in response to the growing prevalence of test-based accountability policies that rely on complex indices, such as scores from value-added models, and that impose consequences on students and educators. This webinar will provide an overview of the relevant standards and will discuss specific applications of them in high-stakes accountability environments. BIOGRAPHY: Laura Hamilton is the Senior Director of Education Measurement and Assessment at American Institutes for Research. Previously, she was the Associate Vice President and Eignor Executive Editor for Educational Testing Service. She was formerly a Senior Behavioral Scientist and Associate Director of RAND Education, a faculty member at the Pardee RAND Graduate School, and an adjunct faculty member in the University of Pittsburgh's Learning Sciences and Policy program. Her research addresses educational assessment, accountability, the measurement and evaluation of instruction and school leadership, the use of data for instructional decision making, and evaluation of technology-based curriculum reforms. She is currently leading or co-leading projects examining high school reform, personalized learning, educator evaluation, and the measurement of interpersonal and intrapersonal competencies. She served as a member of the committee that revised the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing and as chair of a What Works Clearinghouse panel on data-driven decision making, and she currently serves on several state and national panels on topics related to assessment, accountability, and educator evaluation. She is also an editor of the journal Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. She holds a Ph.D. in educational psychology and an M.S. in statistics from Stanford University. USER RATINGS: 3.9 out of 5 STARS (9) American Psychological Association (APA) Buros Center for Testing is approved by the American Psychological Association (APA) to sponsor continuing education for psychologists. Buros Center for Testing maintains responsibility for this program and its content. National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) Buros Center for Testing is approved by the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) to sponsor continuing education for psychologists. Buros Center for Testing maintains responsibility for this program and its content. There is no known commercial support for this program. INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLEMENTS PROVIDED WHEN PURCHASED FOR A COURSE: PowerPoint slides For a brief preview of this video, click link below.